AA MINORITY REPORT 2017 (revised)

Click here

Thursday 26 April 2012

AA Minority report 2012 (continued)(13)


Section 6

Examination of the difference between minority groups minority opinions, a tyranny of very small minorities.

There appears to be some confusion between protecting minority groups, minority opinion and protecting against a tyranny of very small minorities.

Minority groups are described in “Dr. Bob and the Good Old Timers” in chapter XIX, page 239, “Minority groups within A.A. gain acceptance.” The protection of minorities such as these, provided by Warranty Six refers to the all inclusive A.A. membership for the individual alcoholic under Tradition Three. Minority opinion is described in Concept V (. It is clear in A.A. Tradition that that the protection of the minority groups and of minority opinion does not extend to minorities forming special purpose groups, nor does it bear any relation to minority groups with malign dictatorships, who are in violation of Tradition 4. AA members who gather together as groups with a dual purpose or affiliation are described in “Language of the Heart” pages 222-225. A.A. Tradition and warranties of Conference serve to protect the A.A. name against such minority groups.

Any society which is indifferent to the abuse of the vulnerable is destined to corruption and collapse sooner or later, A.A. will be no exception unless the safeguards already available are put in place to prevent it. For a cult groups to exist in A.A. such as the Joys of Recovery, is not acceptable. It shows an immoral failure of duty of care, a failure of Traditions, Concepts and warranties of conference; especially Traditions One, Two,Concepts IX,  XII (warranties 5 and 6).

Generally how exclusive have A.A. meetings become? Doctors and lawyers meetings, women’s meetings, gay meetings; and the host of meetings with very strange titles. Of course, anyone is welcome, except those baffled newcomers who don’t know, who at first point of contact with A.A., might feel excluded simply by the title’s insinuation on the meetings list. Here leadership could be exercised.”

Comment: Now a BDSM AA(?) meeting can be added to the list of “special purpose” groups.

All such groups simply serve to emphasise how “special and different” their members are from the remainder of the fellowship. Alcoholics don't drink the way they drink because they're: female/male, black/brown/white, gay/straight, young/old, newcomers/old timers, of this profession/of that profession etc. We drink the way we drink because we're “powerless over alcohol” - it's that simple! The whole basis of these groups contradicts the injunction frequently directed towards newcomers – look for the similarities not the differences! Moreover a frequent defence offered on the part of “special purpose” groups is that the rest of wouldn't identify with their concerns. If these groups are adhering to their sole and “primary purpose” then the rest of us alcoholics should have no problem understanding at all! If they are not then what on earth are they talking about? Logically (and absurdly) the only outcome that can follow from the extension of this principle is a fellowship composed of a multiplicity of groups composed of one member each, and having, no doubt, a most engaging conversation with him or herself! In other words – no fellowship at all!

Cheerio

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)