AA MINORITY REPORT 2017 (revised)

Click here

Thursday 14 June 2012

AA Minority report 2012 (continued)(16)



Section 9

Are we communicating the A.A. Message in the right way?

Most A.A. members are probably aware the numerical growth in AA has stagnated in recent years. While there may be many contributing factors, we question only one aspect here, whether A.A’s roots in both medicine and religion are being communicated truthfully and holistically in present day A.A. public and newcomer relations. Or has there been too far a shift toward promoting A.A. as a spiritual/religious program, away from that which is essentially a pragmatic program of coping with alcoholism as an illness?

It would appear from the earliest days to the present, the presentation of A.A. as a spiritual program is misunderstood and a great barrier to overcome for many if not most newcomers. For many people in society, the words “spiritual” and “religious” are interchangeable, for others they mean the same thing. A question to ask is: Do people now think A.A. is religious? Do the use of the word God and the serenity prayer in public relations/ newcomer literature give a religious impression and put numbers of alcoholics off from making initial contact? Would the removal of the word God and the serenity prayer from public relations/newcomer literature and replacing them with terms such as “some power beyond themselves” be more effective in attracting and retaining sceptical newcomers?

Just before leaving for Akron, Dr. Silkworth had given me a great piece of advice. Without it A.A. might never have been born. ‘Look, Bill,’ he had said ‘you’re having nothing but failure because you are preaching at these alcoholics… …talking to them about the Oxford Group precepts… … then you top it off by harping on about this mysterious spiritual experience of yours… … …why don’t you turn your strategy the other way round? … …
Aren’t you the fellow who once showed me that book by the psychologist William James? … … … Have you forgotten Dr. Carl Jung in Zurich… …Bill you have got the cart before the horse… … You’ve got to deflate these people first… … So give them the medical business, and give it to them hard. Pour it right into them about the obsession that condemns them to drink and the physical sensitivity or allergy of the body that condemns them to go mad or die if they keep on drinking… … Maybe that will crack their egos deep down…. … Only then can you try your other medicine, the ethical principles… ..” (Bill W. AA Comes of Age page 68)

The word God still aroused some antipathy. When the thought was expressed that there might be a God personal to me this feeling intensified. I didn’t like the idea. I could go for such conceptions as Creative Intelligence, Universal Mind or Spirit of Nature but I resisted the idea of a Czar of the Heavens… … My friend suggested what then seemed a novel idea “Why don’t you choose your own concept of God?” – Bill W. (Alcoholics AnonymousBig Book” page 12)

Fitz fell at once into a hot argument with Henry about the religious content of the coming volume. A newcomer Jimmy B., who like Henry was an ex salesman and a former atheist also got into the hassles. Fitz wanted a powerfully religious document; Henry and Jimmy would have none of it. They wanted a psychological book which would lure the reader in; when he finally arrived among us, there would then be enough time to tip him off about the spiritual character of our society.” (A.A. comes of Age page 17)

Dr. Howard a psychiatrist… … made an important contribution… … Bill said the psychiatrist’s ‘idea was to remove all forms of coercion, to put our fellowship on a ‘we ought’ basis instead of ‘you must’ basis… … … ‘Dr. Howard read [the manuscript] and brought it back the next day’… ‘You have to take out the must. You have to take out the God – the complete God.’ ” (Pass It On page 204)

.. Dr. Harry Tiebut, [sic] the first psychiatrist ever to hold up the hands of our fellowship for all to see… … … The year was 1939, and the book Alcoholics Anonymous was about to hit the press… …we had made prepublication copies in multigraph [sic] … … One of them fell into Harry’s hands… …he at once resolved to show the new volume to a couple of patients, since known to us as Marty and Grenny … …At first the book made little impression … … its heavy larding with the word God so angered Marty that she threw it out of the window, flounced off the grounds… … and proceeded… on a big bender… … Back in her quarters, Marty finally brought herself to leaf through its pages once more. A single phrase caught her eye and it read ‘We cannot live with resentment’… … Forthwith she attended a meeting… … Returning … … she found Grenny intensely curious…
Her first words to him were ‘Grenny we are not alone any more!’ ” (Bill W. A.A. Grapevine July 1966. Language of the Heart page 369)

The unbeliever” (first edition “Big Book,” Alcoholics Anonymous)

I asked the doctor to tell me the truth.” (Experience Strength and Hope page 5)

Make it just a power that will help.” (Experience Strength and Hope page 5)

Educated Agnostic” (first edition “Big Book,” Alcoholics Anonymous)

He told me of other men who had found sobriety through the recognition of some power beyond themselves. If I cared to I was to consider myself invited to a gathering the following Tuesday where I could meet other alcoholics who had stopped.” (Experience Strength and Hope page 104)

Of highest importance would be our relations with medicine and religion. Under no circumstances must we get into competition with either. If we appeared to be a new religious sect, we’d be done for. And if we moved into the medical field, as such, the result would be the same.” (Bill W. AA Grapevine June 1955, Language of the Heart
page 150)


These ex-alcoholic men and women number about one hundred at present. One Group is scattered along the Atlantic seaboard with New York as a center. [sic] Another and somewhat larger body is located in the Middle West… … … The fellowship is entirely indifferent concerning the individual manner of spiritual approach so long as the patient is willing to turn his life and his problems over to the care and direction of his creator. The patient may picture the Deity in any way he likes. No effort is whatever is made to convert him to some particular faith or creed. Many creeds are represented among the group and the greatest harmony prevails. It is emphasized that the fellowship is non-sectarian and that the patient is entirely free to follow his own inclination. Not a trace of aggressive evangelism is exhibited…… Considering the presence of the religious factor, one might expect to find an unhealthy emotionalism and prejudice. This is not the case however; on the contrary there is an instant readiness to discard old methods for new ones which produce better results.” (A.A. Comes of Age, appendix E:a, pages 304-305)


We much regret that these facts of A.A. life are not understood by the legion of alcoholics in the world around us. Any number of them are bedevilled by the dire conviction that if they ever go near AA they will be pressured to conform to some particular brand of faith or theology. They just don’t realise that faith is never a necessity for AA membership; that sobriety can be achieved with an easily acceptable minimum of it; and our concepts of a higher power and God as we understand him afford everyone a nearly unlimited choice of spiritual belief and action” … … … How to transmit this good news is one of our most challenging problems in communication, for which there may be no fast or sweeping answer. Perhaps our public information services could begin to emphasize this all-important aspect of AA more heavily. And within our own ranks we might well develop a more sympathetic awareness of the acute plight of these really isolated and desperate sufferers … … ... … Though three hundred thousand did recover in the last twenty-five years, maybe half a million more have walked into our midst, and then out again… … Yet we can’t well content ourselves with the view that all these recovery failures were entirely the fault of the newcomers themselves … … We didn’t communicate when we might have done so. So we AAs failed them. Perhaps more often than we think, we still make no contact with those suffering the dilemma of no faith.” (Language of the Heart page 251 -252)

It is clear the Oxford Group influence in the formative years of A.A. was as much negative as positive. When compared to the combined influence of others in organised religion and the medical profession, who kept AA on course as a non religious organisation, the time span of Oxford Group influence was very small; two years in New York and five years in Akron. The Oxford Group connection was also a public relations liability. In view of the influence in A.A. today of fundamentalist Christian non A.A. published literature which advocates early A.A. meetings as Oxford Group meetings, we question whether the Oxford Group connection ought now be confined to the A.A. history books, and not be mentioned at all in any public information and newcomer literature.

The Oxford Groupers had clearly shown us what to do. And, just as importantly, we had learned from them what not to do as far as alcoholics were concerned. We had found that certain of their ideas and attitudes could not be sold to alcoholics. For example, drinkers would not take pressure in any form, excepting from John Barleycorn himself. They always had to be led, not pushed. They would not stand for the rather aggressive evangelism of the Oxford Groups. And they would not accept the principle of ‘team guidance’ for their own personal lives.” (A.A. Comes of Age page 74)

He said he was an alcoholic too… … a chemistry professor who was barely managing to hold on to his teaching post. He had come to the Oxford Group at his wife’s urging, but he could not stand their ‘non- sensical’ [sic] talk about God, nor did he like all these ‘aggressive people’ who were trying to save his soul. And while he could not accept Bill’s ‘weird’ religious experience, he certainly did agree with what Bill said about alcoholism… …he stayed drunk on and off for 11 years before finally getting sober in the A.A. program.” (Pass It On page 132)

By the time the article was written, A.A. had become separate from the Oxford Group in both New York and Ohio, and Frank Buchman’s remarks about Hitler had given rise to accusations that the O.G .was pro- Nazi. With war in Europe against the Nazis and feelings on all fronts running high, Bill understandably wanted to avoid being associated with anything controversial, particularly when the fellowship so needed favourable publicity.” (Pass It On page 246)

But all of us East and West were placing increased emphasis on Dr. Silkworth’s expression describing the alcoholic’s dilemma: the obsession plus the allergy” (AA Comes of Age page161)

This incident led Sam Shoemaker to apologize to Bill later, after he himself had broken with the Oxford Group in 1941. Shoemaker wrote: ‘If you ever write the story of A.A.’s early connection with Calvary, I think it ought to be said in all honesty that we were coached in the feeling that you were off on your own spur… … … You got your inspiration from those early days, but you didn’t get much encouragement from us and for my own part in that stupid desire to control the Spirit, as he manifested Himself in individual people like you, I am heartily sorry and ashamed.” (Footnote, Pass It On page 178)

Bob and Sister Ignatia began to work more and more closely through the fall of 1939 in getting drunks into St. Thomas for treatment. One thing worried her, however: Alcoholics Anonymous seemed closely connected with the Oxford Group. ‘At the time, I feared we might become involved with a religious sect of some kind,’ Sister Ignatia recalled. She then asked Father Vincent Haas, a newly ordained priest, to investigate the meetings for her… … …
Fortunately, the group had moved to Kings School by this time, and Father Haas was favourably impressed.” (Dr. Bob and the Good Old Timers” page 189)

On the second day of the New Year, 1940, Dr. Bob wrote Bill: ‘Have finally shaken off the shackles of the Oxford Group.’ ” (Dr. Bob and The Good Old Timers page 218)

Speaking for Dr. Bob and myself I would like to say that there has never been the slightest intent, on his part or mine, of trying to found a new religious denomination. Dr. Bob held certain religious convictions, and so do I. This, of course, the personal privilege of every A.A. member. Nothing however, could be so unfortunate for A.A.’s future as an attempt to incorporate any of our personal theological views into A.A. teaching, practice or
tradition.” - Bill W. (AA Comes of Age page 232)

Beyond a Higher Power, as each of us may vision him, A.A. must never, as a society, enter the field of dogma or theology. We can never become a religion in that sense. Lest we kill our usefulness by being bogged down in theological contention.” - Bill W. (Letter 1954, As Bill sees It page 116)

This was the great contribution of our atheists and agnostics. They had widened our gateway so that all who suffer might pass through, regardless of their belief or lack of belief.” - Bill W. (A.A. Comes of Age page 167)

Cheerio

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)