AA MINORITY REPORT 2017 (revised)

Click here
Showing posts with label AA Minority Report 2013. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AA Minority Report 2013. Show all posts

Friday, 19 September 2014

And finally …... Conference questions (2014) – almost!


55. A proposed minority report for consideration.

Terms of Reference No. 7 The questioner has been referred to document "How to submit a topic or question for Conference".”

Comment: Or as the Terms of Reference should read: how the AA conference avoids confronting an issue when it's staring them directly in the face! Here's the report in question: Minority Report 2013

See here for a full list of other questions that didn't quite get through the 'filter'

Cheers

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)

PS We look forward to next year's crop of discarded questions!

Tuesday, 13 May 2014

Conference questions (2014) – missed! But only by a whisker!


26. Is harmony at Intergroup and Regional level more important than listening to the minority view?
Background
  • Page 82 of As Bill Sees It: Here Bill emphasised the reality and importance of trouble or friction at AA assemblies when he described friction of opposing viewpoints as the very mode of operating upon which we proceed. The minority opinion expressed at Intergroup and Regional assemblies is often the focus of conflicting views and the absence of these frictions can mask our tendency for justifying and rationalising a desire not to listen to minority opinion.
  • Concept 5 emphasises the value of protecting the minority opinion as a check and balance against apathetic, angry or hasty majorities. Allowing a minority opinion to be freely expressed without fear of condemnation might be uncomfortable to a majority of an Intergroup or Regional assembly; however, a minority view can often be right and at the very least will force a majority to debate important issues thoroughly while preventing hasty and unwise decisions being made that are not in the best interests of the still suffering alcoholic. The apparent harmony of a quiet and unruffled assembly can mask the fact that minorities are either too fearful to speak out or are actually prevented from participating in service.
  • The freedom to participate in service helps to guarantee that the minority opinion will be heard. It’s tempting to exclude those people we regard as nuisances for one reason or another and this human tendency will, if allowed to carry on, inevitably erode the democracy and effectiveness of Intergroups and Regions. As a result our future Conference delegates will be unprepared for the opportunities that exist at Conference to speak up when in a minority, as their conscience sees fit when acting in the interests of AA as a whole.

Terms of Reference No. 5 Covered by Committee 5 at Conference 2013”

Comment: Oh do we concur! To which end see AA Minority Report 2013 (which for various reasons – none particularly good – similarly didn't pass muster and make its way into the AA conference's discussions!)

See here for a full list of other questions that didn't quite get through the 'filter'

Cheers

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)

Monday, 20 January 2014

AA MINORITY REPORT 2013




 AA Minority Report 2013 See here

Saturday, 15 June 2013

The Big Book Study Movement


Final Report: Leinster (Eire) Intergroup Sub-Committee (September 2008)





Source: Alcoholics Anonymous General Service Conference of Ireland
Alcoholics Anonymous News Sheet – update – Dec 2008/Jan 2009

Extracts:

No group or individual should deem themselves an authority on how to interpret the Big Book on behalf of others. The steps are suggested and experienced sponsors are wise enough not to give newcomers hard and fast directives. There are no authorities in AA and even self-appointed teachers have “feet of clay”.

Our knowledge of recovery has been received in the Fellowship through the experience of one Alcoholic sharing with another Alcoholic and it was not received on an instructive basis or in a classroom atmosphere”.

Many times we have heard an argument supported with one part of a tradition whilst the second part is completely ignored. This phenomenon seems to occur, quite often, in Tradition 4. “Each group should be autonomous except in matters affecting other groups or AA as a whole. Autonomy seems to be used as an argument, to explain or defend, why a group ought to do what a certain member wants it to do”.

Sponsorship

In AA sponsor and sponsored meet as equals, just as Bill and Dr Bob did”.

The Internet and Website

Conference, (a collective Group Conscience of all the Groups in Ireland, both North and South) requested that there be only one website for Alcoholics Anonymous in Ireland and that the Groups, if they chose, would list the times, dates and places of meetings, as in the Directory, without the contact names and phone numbers, in the interest of unity. Conference felt that if Groups started to host their own websites [eg. The Road to Recovery (cult) group Plymouth], it might create competition between them and would dilute the very purpose of what was intended, which is simply to inform the public and their members, of where and when meeting [sic] are held”.

And finally:

Tradition 5 …..The unique ability of each AA to to identify himself with and bring recovery to the newcomer in no way depends upon his learning, eloquence or any special individual skills”.

(our emphases – in bold print)


Comment: As we've said before (see The Big Book Study Movement is outside of the Structure of Alcoholics Anonymous In Ireland) the General Service Conference of Ireland seems to be light years ahead of its GB equivalent. They have identified the problem, discussed it and evolved a clear strategy to deal with the issues raised. What a contrast they are with Great Britain's service structure which seems barely able to acknowledge that a problem exists at all let alone begin to respond to it! Ostrich-like they bury their heads in the sand in the hope that these dogmatists will just go away (see Minority Report 2013 and Primary Purpose/Back to Basics). We repeat our previous question to our “trusted servants” (??): Precisely how many newcomers have to suffer and die before clear action is taken to exclude these meetings (Primary Purpose, Back to Basics, Visions) from our fellowship? How long are AA members going to continue to inflate the egos (and the pocket books) of the sundry circuit speakers, Big Book 'experts' and other parasites by subscribing to their so-called 'workshops' and assorted 'study guides' together with all the other accessory junk they produce? In fact just when is “I AM RESPONSIBLE” going to be something more than a mere form of words to be mouthed meaninglessly at AA meetings?

Over to you

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)

PS Our thanks to the member who obtained a copy of the newsletter from GSO Ireland

Monday, 7 January 2013

Saturday, 5 January 2013

Thursday, 3 January 2013

Tuesday, 1 January 2013

Wednesday, 26 December 2012

Thursday, 20 December 2012

Tuesday, 18 December 2012

Sunday, 16 December 2012

Friday, 14 December 2012

Wednesday, 12 December 2012

Monday, 10 December 2012

Saturday, 8 December 2012

Conference Steering Committee: Terms of Reference




With reference to the AA Minority Report 2013 rejected under the Terms of Reference provision:

7. Submission not accepted for reasons other than the above”

Apparently the authors of the AA Minority Report 2012 having carried out the recommendations proposed by the committee previously ie. removal of direct references to outside organisations (placing these in series of separate appendices outside the main body of the report), have not quite jumped through enough hoops to satisfy this august body. Indeed the committee was faced with the awful prospect that it might have to allow the minority report through. Fortunately someone had had the presence of mind to ensure that a 'catch all' clause was available to ensure that such eventualities did not occur ie. Clause 7. As you can see this means that the committee can reject anything … and for any reason it likes! Think of an excuse and Bob's your uncle ….the offending item just disappears!

So the new “reason” for not accepting the submission was, and we quote:

..the principle of the report was based on “issues outside of AA GB”.

Apart from the fact that the “reason” (?) given is about as opaque as you can make it according to our interpretation the committee seems to be of the opinion that AA unity only refers to that bit of it inside Great Britain whereas “the principle of the report” actually refers to AA unity everywhere ....... as do indeed our Traditions! (see here).

Somehow we don't think the “ostrich” manoeuvre is going to work for much longer. This problem is NOT one that's just going to disappear!

But never fear! In the immortal words of Arnie “The Terminator” Schwarzenegger: “WE'LL BE BACK!

Cheerio

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)