A
wildly imaginative dianoetic rambling concerning the the “basic
text” of Alcoholics Anonymous (viz. the Big Book) (our comments in
red print)
Foreword to Second Edition (pp. xvi-xviii)
“This
physician [Dr
Bob]
had repeatedly tried spiritual
means to resolve his alcoholic dilemma but had failed. But
when the broker gave him Dr. Silkworth’s description of alcoholism
and its hopelessness,
[Note:
According to this description it was a non-alcoholic's analysis of
the problem which was key to Dr Bob's breakthrough] the
physician began to pursue the spiritual
remedy
for his malady
[the
'disease'
concept – see also
Alcoholism, moral issue or disease?]
with
a willingness he had never before been able to muster. He sobered,
never to drink again up to the moment of his death in1950. This
seemed to prove that one alcoholic could affect another as no
nonalcoholic could [but
see here
for a non-alcoholic's potential role in “affecting” recovery].
It also
indicated that strenuous work, one alcoholic with another, was vital
to permanent ['permanent'
in the sense of persistent ie. NOT cured] recovery.
Hence
the two men set to work almost frantically upon alcoholics arriving
in the ward of the Akron City Hospital. Their very first case, a
desperate one, recovered immediately and became A.A.number three [pp.
182-192]. He never had another drink. This work
at Akron continued through the summer of 1935. There were many
failures, but there was an occasional heartening success [see
Recovery rates]. When the broker returned to New York in the
fall of 1935, the first A.A. group had actually been formed, though
no one realized it at the time.
A
second small group promptly took shape at New York, to be followed in
1937 with the start of a third at Cleveland. Besides these, there
were scattered alcoholics who had picked up the basic ideas in Akron
or New York who were trying to form groups in other cities. By late
1937, the number of members having substantial sobriety time behind
them was sufficient to convince the membership that a new light had
entered the dark world of the alcoholic.
It
was now time, the struggling groups thought, to place their message
and unique experience before the world. This determination bore fruit
in the spring of 1939 by the publication of this volume. The
membership had then reached about 100 men and women. The fledgling
society, which had been nameless, now began to be called Alcoholics
Anonymous, from the title of its own book. The flying-blind period
ended and A.A. entered a new phase of its pioneering time.
With
the appearance of the new book a great deal began to happen. Dr. Harry Emerson Fosdick
[p. 2],
the noted clergyman, reviewed it with approval. In the fall of 1939
Fulton Oursler, then editor of Liberty,
printed a piece in his magazine, called “Alcoholics and God.” This brought a rush of 800 frantic inquiries
into the little New York office which meanwhile had been established.
Each inquiry was painstakingly answered; pamphlets and books were
sent out. Businessmen, travelling out of existing groups, were
referred to these prospective newcomers. New groups started up and it
was found, to the astonishment of everyone, that A.A.’s
message could be transmitted in the mail as well as by word of mouth.
By the end of 1939 it was estimated that 800 alcoholics were on their
way to recovery.
In
the spring of 1940, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. gave a dinner for many of his friends
to which he invited A.A. members to tell their stories. News of this
got on the world wires; inquiries poured in again and many people
went to the bookstores to get the book “Alcoholics Anonymous.’’
By March1941 the membership had shot up to 2,000. Then Jack
Alexander wrote a feature article in the Saturday Evening Post and placed
such a compelling picture of A.A. before the general public that
alcoholics in need of help really deluged us. By the close of 1941,
A.A. numbered 8,000 members. The mushrooming process was in full
swing. A.A. had become a national institution.”
(our
emphases)
Cheerio
The
Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)
Caution:
This curse (sorry!!) COURSE is not to be taken as AUTHORITATIVE nor
is it to be regarded as DEFINITIVE in any way. Anyone found to be
according it any undue status will be reported to the appropriate
authorities (ie. GSO York or whoever) who will then do ….
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! (quite rightly too we say!). Moreover any person
discovered to be quoting from the aforementioned course will be
TERMINATED with extreme prejudice!
No comments:
Post a Comment