See here for original blog entry
Under Readers' comments.
We quote:
“my
experience with 2 yrs of AA
I
do not believe that AA is a cult, nor do I believe that it doesn't
work for some people. I do, however, believe that the AA program has
two major shortcomings. One major problem I see with AA is the way
members of the program diagnose an "alcoholic." They pretty
much assume that if you are there at a meeting, you have a hopeless
"disease" in which you either work the progam or die an
alcoholic death. If you are not working the program you are a "Dry
Drunk." If you question whether or not you are an "alcoholic"
you are most definitely in denial. I had members of AA tell me this
after my first meeting without even knowing me personally or my
drinking background. The second major problem is the program today is
forced on people who have merely had isolated incidents in their
lives and are not real alcoholics. Why are these major problems with
the AA program? Consider this: Not everybody who is introduced into
AA is a "true" alcoholic. Keep in mind that the founder of
the program, Bill Wilson, was drinking two to three bottles of
bathtub gin a day. These are the kinds of people who need AA, but
today's AA is mostly void of these kinds of people. For example, my
introduction to AA is much like many other people's introduction into
today's AA program. I got a DWI (Driving while intoxicated) when I
was 24. On the suggestion of my attorney, I attended several AA
meetings voluntarily before my court date so that I could show the
judge that I was taking positive steps to better my situation before
showing up to court. In response, the court ordered me to 3 meetings
a week for the duration of my probation which was 1 1/2 years. So, as
you can see, I have been to several AA meetings involuntarily. I
would say I have observed at least 1/2 of the people attending these
meetings were also either court ordered or sent their involuntarily.
AA has been good and bad for me. I had to drop most of my previous
friends at the time of my arrest and became friends with mostly
alcoholics in the program due to my extensive amount of time spent
there. AA has some great people with good intentions. But the road to
hell is paved with good intentions. I do not go to AA today by
choice. It is very depressing and I find it hurts my outlook on life
more than helps it. I was actually told by a member of AA that
because he did not work the steps properly that "he wanted to
put a gun in his mouth at 25 yrs sober." He was implying this
would happen to me. I have never been suicidal in my life and if I
were at 25 yrs sober I do not believe it would have anything to do
with alcoholism. That was my final bout with AA. Today I am involved
in the things that I enjoy in life. I make positive choices for
myself. Mountain biking, rock climbing, volunteering, spending time
with the people that I love in my life. I meet people through these
positive activities instead of hanging out in bars and this has
increased my standard of life dramatically. I attribute my experience
to growing up and learning from my mistakes rather than "alcoholism."
On the downside, nearly all of the people I have met over the 1 1/2
years of attending AA I no longer have friendships with. Why? Because
I am a "dry drunk" to them and will most likely die an
alcoholic death. This has been very disturbing and damaging to me and
hard for me to swallow. I still see some friends that I met in AA
upon occasion. But it is a weird and uncomfortable experience in
which they act concerned about my well being and try to get me to
come back to meetings. Honestly, I feel that I am better off meeting
positive people outside of the AA program for this very reason. It
seems that even some members with 20 plus years sobriety have extreme
difficulty in moving on with their lives. I simply do not see how a
behavior that they quit 20 yrs ago can still have such a big impact
on their lives. Maybe someone like Bill Wilson who put themselves
through the "alcoholic" ringer needs that kind of daily
support. However, for at least for me that kind of thinking keeps me
from moving on to bigger and better things.”
Comment:
This demonstrates the inadvisability of 'diagnosing' other people to
be alcoholic, and the questionable practice of 'enforced' (via DWI
etc) attendance at AA meetings.
Cheers
The
Fellas (Friends
of Alcoholics Anonymous)
PS
To use “comment” system simply click on “Comments” tab below
this article and sign in. All comments go through a moderation stage
There is something that I find "offensive" in this posting. The author keeps referring to the AA program, or programme to you Brits. To me AA has always been a FELLOWSHIP, as we say in our preamble. As soon as AA becomes a program/programme, then we are on our merry way to becoming a cult or a religion.
ReplyDeleteIN my limited experience in AA [ 20 years ] when people start to talk about the "AA program/programme" these are the people who want ot take over and run my live and run the meetings "their way>'
I hate references to the "program/programme!"
I agree that members of AA can not and should not diagnose anyone as an alcoholic. Self diagnosis has always been at the heart of our appeal and at the heart of our success. If we can't diagnose and have it be helpful then a judge and a probation officer surely can't do it. Furthermore, if a party comes to AA and then decides that they aren't alcoholic or that they do not think that AA is the solution to their alcohol problem (or lack there of) then they should be encourage to seek solutions elsewhere they see fit. Not as a judge sees fit.
ReplyDeleteI agree that AA members can not and should not diagnose anyone other than themselves as an alcoholic. Having said that, then it follows that a judge would be an even worse candidate to do any diagnosis. And certainly a poor choice to determine what anyone should do about their alcohol problem. Self diagnosis and the power to decide if and when you are a member of AA is at the heart of our attraction.
ReplyDelete