AA MINORITY REPORT 2017 (revised)

Click here

Friday, 28 June 2013

Predators – their part – our part!


A member drew our attention to this case study (for want of a better expression) of predatory behaviour within AA entitled: Predators Lurk in Alcoholics Anonymous

Some extracts:

The structure of AA actually serves to help the individual who wants to prey on people. New members are encouraged to seek out a “sponsor”, a person who has been clean and sober for some time and knows the 12-step program. This person must be of the same sex. This is ostensibly to prevent men from preying on women, but same sex predators can – and do – exploit the AA system.“

Ironically, the regulars in the AA community are usually aware of who the predators are, in fact …... came under scrutiny from a local AA chapter, when their leadership council voted to ban him from their meeting place after accusations of inappropriate behavior with sponsees.“

After …... was banned from that AA location, a general meeting was held which drew a standing-room-only crowd and resulted in heated debate. …... admitted he had engaged in homosexual behavior in his past but denied inappropriate actions with members of AA. Many were unconvinced, but the crowd voted to allow ….... back in the meetings. One member said, “Who are we to exclude anyone? Our program teaches us to be inclusive.””

Comment: What is interesting about the above is not so much what it says about the predator (he is what he is and must take responsibility for his actions) but rather what it says about some members of AA. Apparently it is acceptable (or tolerable) to the latter to allow certain individuals to sexually exploit (and otherwise) newcomers to the fellowship on the grounds that to bar them from meetings would not be “inclusive”. Here the rights of the predator are to be upheld but not those of their victims. One individual may prey upon literally scores of newcomers, perhaps driving them away from the fellowship and even condemning them to death, and apparently that's OK so long as the perpetrator's sobriety is safeguarded! Well guess what? It isn't OK! In fact it's an abdication of responsibility and indication of moral bankruptcy. We would remind these members here of AA guidelines (GB):



and in particular:

Failure to challenge and stop inappropriate behaviour gives the offender permission to repeat the offensive behaviour and encourages others to follow suit”.

Bullying, harassment, intimidation, sexual predation undoubtedly exist in AA, an inevitable consequence perhaps of any social grouping. Inevitable maybe but NOT to be either condoned or ignored. Within the cult groups this kind of conduct is endemic, even systemic, and sanctioned under the guise of 'strong sponsorship' or so-called 'tough love'. The 'carrot and stick' approach with the 'twelve promises' dangled as an incentive to the sponsee to comply coupled with numerous reminders (sometimes explicit) that failure to accede to their sponsor's every “suggestion” (ie. direction) will inevitably result in relapse and perhaps death is a powerful combination to resist especially when presented as the 'authentic' AA message to the vulnerable newcomer. So how about the newcomer's rights! What happened to the concept of a 'duty of care'? The General Service Office (York) can't do anything about this problem nor can the General Service Conference. So guess where the bucks stops! ….... You got it!

So if you've got a bully/predator in your midst (and you're sure of your facts) confront them (preferably in front of the group). Ask them to account for their conduct. If they're unable to do so inform them of the consequences if they continue. ie. banned from attending the meeting. If they don't get the message go ahead and ban them. Inform other groups and members of your decision. If it's a cult group where such conduct is the norm then it's up to other groups in the area to apply sanctions. Exclude the group from the local intergroup and refuse to recognise them as an AA group - and then make sure to publicise the fact remembering to notify any outside organisations that may be in contact with them. Remember: Our first duty is to the alcoholic who wants to stop drinking not to facilitate those who have other motives for attending meetings – that's our primary purpose!

Over to you,

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)

PS Our thanks to the member who drew this essay to our attention