AA MINORITY REPORT 2017 (revised)

Click here

Saturday 19 July 2014

Conference questions (2014) – almost! (contd)


35. Would Conference consider what help may be given to those considering the formation of a non –Geographical Intergroup or Region open to all and any AA group within the UK?

Background

A non‐geographical Intergroup or Region would function like existing Intergroups yet its membership would not be contingent on location.
A non‐geographical Intergroup or Region would increase unity in the UK Fellowship by allowing groups which are currently being excluded from their geographical Intergroup, to participate fully in the Three Legacies of the Fellowship they serve.
All AA groups should be able to contribute to our National group Conscience. Tradition 2, Concept 12 Warranties 4 & 6
More and more Intergroups are trying to throw out AA groups that they disagree with.
The GSB/GSO are refusing to recognize new Intergroups unless the Intergroups who banish groups agree with it.
It is clearly wrong for Intergroups to have the final say in AA. Concept 1, Concept 4
AA Guideline on Personal Conduct refers to “Discrimination”
Continental Europe example

Terms of Reference No. 6 Local issue that depends on relevant circumstances”

Comment: This simply represents yet another desperate attempt by the cult groups to gain a foothold within AA! Notwithstanding the various flourishes of Concept This, Warranty That and Legacy The Other intergroups, like the groups they serve, can exercise their 'right' to autonomy albeit with due consideration being given to the impact on other groups and AA as a whole (and see Tradition Four). But the cult groups are very, VERY bad news for AA generally so any intergroup that either refuses access to them or takes steps to 'hoik' them out is doing us all a great favour. Do we really want the first contact a newcomer has with AA to be via a cult telephone responder? Do we want really want them to be 12 stepped by some fanatic robotically miming 'never had a bad day', 'always do what your sponsor says' …. blah di blah di blah? Much better they are welcomed into the fellowship by a man or woman who can actually communicate from their own experience (and not their sponsor's!) - and can string a sentence together that does not involve 'clone speak'. It always strikes us as highly ironic (if not entirely hypocritical) that the cult groups are always more than eager to cite the traditions and concepts when it suits their purpose but when challenged on their own breaches of these guidelines always claim the defence that there are no rules in AA! Quite right. There aren't! But then that cuts both ways doesn't it! Of course the cult groups could always form their own fellowship. How about Nutters Anonymous? Perhaps not entirely attractive but on the other hand completely accurate!

See here for a full list of other questions that didn't quite get through the 'filter'

Cheers

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)

No comments:

Post a Comment