The
AA (General Service conference approved) booklet: Questions and Answers on Sponsorship)
Extract:
“Can
a sponsor be too firm?
Some
sponsors believe in being fairly blunt with a newcomer. They describe
the A.A. Program as they understand it. They explain what A.A. has
meant to them. They point out that there is no known cure for
alcoholism, but that it can be arrested.
Having
done these things, they leave the next move up to the newcomer. If
the still-drinking alcoholic does not reach a decision immediately to
join A.A., this sponsor believes in letting the situation alone.
This
approach is not totally unsympathetic. Many alcoholics respect it and
recognize it as an attempt to be completely factual about A.A., to
avoid emotion.
The
A.A. program is based on certain tested principles, which a newcomer
may disregard only at risk. Firm sponsorship emphasizes this and
usually works well in convincing the newcomer. Most A.A.s, however,
recognize that firmness overdone can upset a newcomer. It should be
tempered with sympathy and understanding.”
Comment:
Yeah! They can be too firm. You need to 'tenderise' them a bit
otherwise they're difficult to swallow! But what's too firm about
this approach? You're just telling the guy the facts as you
understand them (or to use AA parlance – you're merely sharing your
experience, strength and hope with them). We're all grown-ups aren't
we? We can all make up our own minds about how we want to proceed.
We're not flogging deodorant. There's no need to dress it up or make
fake claims about AA. Just tell them what you know. The rest is up to
them and their Higher Power. On the other hand some people interpret
'firm' as just plain bullying eg. the cult. We've even heard recently
a cult member inform a newcomer that unless they get a sponsor
they'll drink again! Yeah. Right. We all know that's part of the AA
recovery programme – NOT!
But
remember: a sponsor is NOT ESSENTIAL to recovery. And NO sponsorship
is better by far than BAD sponsorship!
Cheers
The
Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)
(to
be continued)
No comments:
Post a Comment