Here
it is:
“Alcoholics
Anonymous is a
fellowship of men and women
who share their experience,
strength and hope with each other that they may solve their common
problem and help others to recover from alcoholism.
The only requirement for membership is a desire to stop drinking. There are no dues or fees for AA membership; we are self-supporting through our own contributions.
AA is not allied with any sect, denomination, politics, organisation or institution; does not wish to engage in any controversy; neither endorses nor opposes any causes. Our primary purpose is to stay sober and help other alcoholics to achieve sobriety.”
The only requirement for membership is a desire to stop drinking. There are no dues or fees for AA membership; we are self-supporting through our own contributions.
AA is not allied with any sect, denomination, politics, organisation or institution; does not wish to engage in any controversy; neither endorses nor opposes any causes. Our primary purpose is to stay sober and help other alcoholics to achieve sobriety.”
(our
emphasis)
“direct
personal participation or observation; actual knowledge or contact”
to be contrasted with opinion:
“a belief or conclusion held with confidence but not substantiated
by positive knowledge or proof”
It may be
noted from the above that “experience” refers to “direct
personal participation or observation”. This does not imply of
itself that any statement may be made as to the general validity of
the observation etc so acquired unless it is similarly confirmed by
repetition by others (eg. the scientific method). Thus although one
individual may have an “experience”, draw certain conclusions
from it and determine their future actions accordingly, it does not
automatically follow that another individual should act similarly
until they too have confirmed the sequence. But even here different
people may have similar experiences (it is impossible for these
experiences to be identical) but draw varying conclusions which may
tend towards a differing outcome. Or to put it another way - just
because something works well for you doesn't automatically mean that
it will for others. Hence although we may “share” our
“experience” with others in the hope that they may arrive at
similar conclusions - and benefit accordingly - we cannot assume this
to be the case; this would be the height of arrogance. The dogma
associated with the cult, however, runs counter to this principle.
Here it is indeed assumed that 'one size fits all' regardless of the
outcome as newcomers are manipulated, coerced or directed to abide by
a set of frequently quite arbitrary 'rules' (or “suggestions” in
cult speak), and where failure to comply leads necessarily to
relapse. However “experience” demonstrates that it is entirely
possible to get and remain sober without doing the steps, without the
assistance of a sponsor, without praying (on your knees or in any
other position), without writing gratitude lists, without ringing up
(and boring) two newcomers a day, without studying the Big Book (as
if it were some subject to be mastered!) etc etc etc. It's even
possible for an alcoholic to get sober without attending AA at all!
Who'd have thought it!
Cheers
The Fellas
(Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)
No comments:
Post a Comment