AA MINORITY REPORT 2017 (revised)

Click here

Thursday, 4 June 2015

Conference questions not quite up to par! (contd)


31. 
Would Conference consider whether attempts to make AA visible could sometimes conflict with the primary purpose or lead us to act contrary to the Traditions?

The primary purpose is to help people recover from alcoholism. Making sure that the public are informed that AA has a solution is important, but has the fixation on displaying the name of Alcoholics Anonymous here, there and everywhere overshadowed that primary purpose and led to a danger of counteracting the good, consistent, effective, straightforward, unsensational PI work carried out throughout the Fellowship?

Reason for question

There is a concern about proposals to put banners in prominent places in the streets. Some feel this practice is promotional and that it could, particularly in small towns or communities, give an impression of AA which, rather than attract newcomers, could deter them from making contact.

Alcoholics Anonymous must be visible so that sufferers will find us but it is also special and different and not to be classed with organisations that tout for business or votes or whose chief concern is to get bums on seats.

There is also concern that PI initiatives carried out ‘on the back’ of non AA initiatives or personalities or officials, may also give the wrong impression of AA. When AA is contacted during press attention on issues regarding the treatment of alcoholism or on measures to combat alcohol abuse, an overriding wish to get Alcoholics Anonymous visible can lead to press coverage that implies that AA is part of the debate on the issue. Surely it is always best for AA to initiate articles or notices in the press (and to do so often) and not to let the desire to be noticed lead us into public controversy.

In the 1950s, the following was written, “While it is right and necessary that the work in AA should be widely known it seems the spread of this knowledge can best be accomplished by members and their friends and of course AA literature. Every effort should be made to keep that work free from the taint of sensationalism”.

Terms of Reference No. 5 Discussed at Conference 2014

Comment: Attraction rather than promotion! Take note self-PROMOTING 'circuit speakers', local gurus, recovery 'experts' and the like. And do we really need audio recordings of speakers at conventions? Nobody's THAT good!

Cheers

The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)

PS For AA Minority Report 2013 cilck here

No comments:

Post a Comment