Allegations have been made that an officer of Plymouth Intergroup (mostly controlled by the Road to Recovery cult group, which have featured extensively in our blog over the last few years) has been systematically embezzling funds over a five year period (2011 to 2015) amounting to approximately £14,000. The person in question apparently suffers from a gambling addiction, which may go some way to explain their conduct but doesn't excuse it. However astonishingly (or not when you consider we're talking about the Road to Recovery here!) the Intergroup decided during the course of an extraordinary meeting convened to discuss the issue (which was attended by only two GSRs – there are 27 groups in the Plymouth Intergroup area) NOT to inform the police of the fraud NOR the General Service Office in York NOR even other local groups. Instead they opted for a cover up. The money, it is claimed, has been replaced although it is not entirely clear how. South West Region (which includes Plymouth Intergroup) have only recently become aware of these murky goings on.
We
informed the General Service Office on Thursday 11th
June by email (to which, so far, we have received no reply - see
below) of the above and proposed that they immediately inform the
police so that a full and proper investigation may be carried out.
Embezzlement is a criminal offence. We have also pointed out that
failure to notify the police may itself result in criminal charges
being brought ie. an accessory after the fact:
“Re: Alleged fraud Plymouth Intergroup Attn: GSO with cc to Trustees
“Re: Alleged fraud Plymouth Intergroup Attn: GSO with cc to Trustees
aa
cultwatch
Jun 11 at 7:09 AM
Jun 11 at 7:09 AM
To
gso@alcoholics-anonymous.org.uk
To whom it
may concern,
We assume
that you have already been informed of the above matter. If not:
We have
received information (…............) that an alleged fraud has been
committed by the Treasurer of Plymouth Intergroup (…..... - home
group Road to Recovery Plymouth) amounting to some £14,000, the
monies being embezzled over a five year period from 2011 to 2015. We
have also been notified that when the Plymouth Intergroup became
aware of the theft they decided not to inform the police nor other
groups in the area (Plymouth Intergroup is apparently virtually run
by the Road to Recovery group) nor yourselves. The money has been
replaced (although by whom it is not clear) but the fraud remains. As
you may be aware failure to inform the police may itself constitute
grounds for arrest as an accessory. These matters were disclosed at
South West Region meeting on Sunday night. We understand members in
the area are currently deliberating the question. In our view GSO
should itself take immediate action and notify the police so that a
thorough investigation may be conducted. In order to ensure that no
further attempts are made to sweep this under the carpet we will be
putting the salient facts up on our blog this Saturday. Moreover we
are quite prepared to notify the police ourselves of the allegation
should the fellowship fail to act. In light of this we would request
that you confirm whether you propose to take any action or not? And
if so what?
The
Fellas”
(edited to
preserve anonymity)
Updates to follow
Cheers
The Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)
When your homegroup teaches you that you are superior to and "above" the rest of AA, then I guess the next logical step is to think that you are above the law of the land too. It seems that, as far as the Road To Recovery cult is concerned, not only is this a case "misery is optional" - but also Morality and Legality are optional too. Did their Grand Poobah the (dis) "Honourable" Clancy tell them what to do I wonder ?
ReplyDeleteAlso, quite apart from the criminal aspect to all this, the fact the an Intergroup is dominated by the Road to Recovery cult is very alarming. As these cults are sponsor driven and hierarchical, it means that the entire Intergroup is in effect controlled by one person – the chief sponsor and most egotistical bully. It is an affront to AA democracy and individual freedom of conscience.
ReplyDelete