Extracts from the aacultwatch forum (old):
“It can
be seen from Traditions Three and Four that an individual alcoholic’s
unconditional right to be an A.A. member is all inclusive, never
exclusive, but there is no such right afforded to any two or three
alcoholics gathered together as a group. There is “one
important qualification” which is all exclusive except for as a
group they have no other purpose or affiliation. – Therefore
any two or three alcoholics gathered together as a group may
not necessarily qualify themselves to be called an A.A. group, as
stated in warranty six: “Finally, any two or three alcoholics
gathered together for sobriety may call themselves an A.A. group
provided that, as a group, they have no other purpose or
affiliation”. (Concept 12, warranty 6). This is further confirmed
in warranty five: “If individual A.A.s wish to gather together for
retreats, Communion breakfasts, or indeed any undertaking at all, we
still say “Fine. Only we hope you won’t designate your efforts as
an A.A. group or enterprise” (Concept 12, warranty five).
As Bill W.
explains: “I think we might sum it up like this: “AA members who
are so inclined should be encouraged to band together in groups to
…”….”But they ought to refrain from calling themselves AA
groups”……....... “But obviously, such a dual purpose group
should not insist that it be called an AA group nor should it use the
AA name in its title.” (Bill W. AA Grapevine February 1958 -
Language of the Heart pages 222-225). - It can be understood
that any two or three alcoholics gathered together as a group
has no right to insist any other A.A. member, group, intergroup or
any part of A.A. calls them an A.A. Group.
It can be
understood that a group’s autonomy, or in other words, its liberty
to violate all A.A.’s Traditions, its “right to be wrong”
extends strictly to its own affairs. There is a well defined line in
the Tradition Four at which an A.A. group’s autonomy ends and where
the principles of Traditions One and Two take precedence; assuming
“trusted servants” and “elder statesmen” are willing to apply
the able leadership of Tradition Two, Concept IX; and the “specific
application” of Tradition Four:
“Tradition
Four is a specific application of general principles already outlined
in Traditions One and Two. Tradition One states: “Each member of
Alcoholics Anonymous is but a small part of a great whole”……..
“Hence our common welfare comes first”………….”there is
but one ultimate authority…” (Bill W, Tradition Four, Grapevine March 1948. Language of the Heart page 80).
It can be
understood that a trusted servant’s “right of decision”
(Concept III) not to call any group alcoholics gathered together with
another purpose or affiliation an AA group is a responsible
informative and assertive statement of Traditions One, Two and
warranties 5 and 6. It follows that if a “such a dual purpose group
should not insist that it be called an AA group”, as stated by Bill
W, “nor should it use the AA name in its title.” (Bill W. AA
Grapevine February 1958. Language of the Heart pages 222-225), then
there is no compulsion in Tradition One for to any part of A.A. to
register it as one. – It can be seen that if, at any time a
compulsion were to be imposed on a trusted servant’s “right
of decision” not to register a group, then this would violate the
principle in Tradition One: “No AA can compel another to do
anything.” and Concept III, thus making the ability to apply
Traditions and warranties of Conference invalid. The “right of
decision” is defined in Concept III: “Therefore some traditional
and practical principle has to be devised which at all levels will
continuously balance the right relation between ultimate authority
and delegated responsibility.” How, then are we to accomplish
this?” ….”The right A.A. solution has been found, however, in
the latter part of Tradition Two, which provides for “trusted
servants.” This really means that we ought to trust our responsible
leaders to decide, within the understood framework of their
duties, how they will interpret and apply their own authority and
responsibility to each particular problem or situation as it arises.”
(Concept III)”
The
Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)
PS
To use “comment” system simply click on the relevant tab below
this article and sign in. All comments go through a moderation stage
PPS
For new aacultwatch forum see here.
Have your say!
No comments:
Post a Comment