Extracts
from the aacultwatch forum (old):
“I
had the misfortune to be sponsored by David B a number of years ago. I fell for the spiel being a
somewhat impressionable newcomer. He was certainly charming
enough and could "talk the talk" no end. But show any
sign of independent thought, even dare to express your own viewpoint,
and you rapidly enough saw the other side of that particular
coin. For someone who preached sponsorship till your ears
bled he was notoriously evasive when it came to the subject
of his own sponsor. Turns out he didn't have one which pretty
much fits his profile - all image and not much else.
As for other meetings he was pretty open in his contempt for these
and only encouraged people to go to them to "spread the
word" or rather the morally defective and
emotionally enfeebled version of the programme which was
his stock-in-trade. The guy was even terrified to go to them
himself fearful that if he got caught "off his turf"
he might be presented with a few home truths by those who had a real
recovery under their belts. The guy didn't even get beyond Step 3.
There was only one HP in David B's life and that was .... guess
who! But it would be dishonest for me to say I learnt
nothing from him. On the contrary he was a teacher beyond
parallel when it came to instructing people on how NOT to carry the
AA message, how NOT to relate to other members, and he quite
definitely didn't have anything that I wanted. My recovery took
place after I had parted company with him and the "Ploys of
Recovery". When I heard that he had finally shuffled off apart
from a large measure of indifference on my part I was just glad that
no one else had to endure his tedious moralising. Unfortunately
what he has spawned is actually worse than the original hence my
support for aacultwatch.”
“I
too remember David B sitting at the front of the meeting facing the
audience in a “commanding” position. I attended the Vision for
You group at Eaton Square around the same time as you did. The Vision
was a breakaway from the Joys of Recovery. I cannot now remember the
exact reason for the breakaway, but I think it had something to do
with not responding when people introduce themselves and “keeping
the serenity prayer as it was originally written” i.e. not adding
“it works if you work it”. This was the so-called “original”
format that David B wanted for his group/cult. There was no democracy
at that group, the steering committee was controlled by David B
through the pyramid sponsorship system. I saw many abuses and lies
being told at that group. David B himself did not have a sponsor. He
claimed that a man called Frank who lived in America was his sponsor.
However after David died some enquiries were made, and the Frank in
question turned out to be someone who was drinking and had no idea he
was sponsoring anyone. I do know that leading members of the Vision
group, including David “the Icon” C, knew about David B’s
deception in this matter but chose not to rock the boat or betray
their Great Leader. I witnessed David B sack a number of his sponsees
who questioned David’s lack of a sponsor. Also, for someone who
promoted service to the hilt, he was remarkably inactive himself.
Around the time of his death he had not had any service commitment
for nigh on 10 years. This from a man who told others they should
have at least 2 service commitments. Nor did David ring any newcomers
to my knowledge, in spite of demanding that others ring 2 per day!
No, David was very much a “do as I say and not as I do” man. He
made up arbitrary rules that contradicted AA approved literature. For
example one of his edicts ordered that no one should do voluntary
work outside AA. In other words if, for example, you wanted to do
some voluntary work in a homeless shelter for a few nights per week,
or something similar, this was forbidden by David B. Only service
work for AA, (or more accurately for David’s cult) was allowed.
This contradicts suggestions in the AA Book Living Sober which David
clearly had not read. Another rule he made up was that his
sponsees/group members were not allowed to work or train as social
workers or counselors or religious clergy. Because what they might
learn or practice “might contradict AA” (=might contradict David
B). This of course goes against AA literature too, and is even
described as being an anti-social attitude in the 12x12. It places AA
in conflict with wider society. David wanted his sponsee-puppets to
be as ignorant and superstitious as possible – much more easy to
control that way.
The
mantle of ignorance and superstition is now being ably carried on by
David C
“the Icon”, who now works in the USA as a Catholic iconographer
and broadcaster. He is the chief author of 2 websites which have been
mentioned in several places in the aacultwatch site and have brought
AA into disrepute. The “Handbook to the Big Book” and associated
website is one of his masterworks. This ignominious tome contains
the instructions for step 4 where the sponsee has to write a detailed
account of his sexual exploits including sex with children, animals,
bottles etc and sexual positions and fantasies. It is a voyeurs
charter. This sick evil garbage has already caused problems in AA in
North London, and I recently discovered that the same document is
being circulated in Ealing – most likely by Happy Dennis who is a
sponsee of David C. Happy Dennis also promotes David C’s website
on his “suggestions” card and the “book of Big Book Quotes”.
All in breach of AA Traditions of course.
David
C "Icon" is never short of an opinion or two, usually
conceited, ill-informed, and based upon an extreme fundamentalist
version of catholic dogma. His recent broadcasts in the USA for
Catholic TV were a set of programs on art where, among other things,
he attacks Picasso and rubbishes all modern art while craftily
alluding to the “humility” of his own efforts and approach to
art. On another show he visits a Museum and goes on to insult some
Buddhist and Hindu statues there, saying that they are not fit to
grace his home or garden, but assuring us that he will not take a
hammer to them and smash them up (how good of him!) Apparently this
is because the statues in question do not represent or follow
“Catholic faith and truth”. It’s a pity his concern for “truth”
didn’t extend to the matter of David B’s imaginary sponsor.
David C ("Icon"/"Way of Beauty") is an arrogant
elitist opinionated bore and a religious bigot. He scarcely disguises
his contempt for eastern religions - "everyone today seems to be
a Buddhist" he sneers sarcastically. His somewhat dour
personality is as frigid and one-dimensional as the Icons he paints.
In spite of his alleged “humility” he is a perverter and
subverter of AA in the UK.
As
for Happy Dennis, indeed he is a strange man. One does not have to be in
his presence for long to realize that something is amiss in the
sanity department. He has adopted the practice of “jumping for joy”
every time he meets you or talks to you. From a distance it looks
comical - like he has bad case of the hiccoughs - as he greets people
attending his groups in Ealing. He is wont to ludicrous repetitions
and exaggerations for example he will say “I am very very very very
very very happy .. and I’m even happier than that” One is left
wondering if he is more trying to convince himself of how “happy”
he is, than his audience. He also sometimes speaks very rapidly –
in the manner of someone suffering from a form a mania. As for his
Book of Big Book Quotes, I’m not a legal expert, but I think there
is a strong possibility that it breaches copyright as he has taken
extensive quotes not just from the main text of the BB but also from
the personal stories section and from later editions which are still,
I believe, under copyright. When he shares he often misquotes the
literature, so it wouldn’t surprise me if his next effort will be
to re-write the entire Big Book itself. The man is a self-willed
goon. But he has completely polarized and divided the fellowship in
the Ealing area, undermining long established local meetings.
These
sick narcissistic personalities are damaging and perverting AA in
this country and I am glad that there is now a forum and website
exposing them and defending AA. Knowledge is power!”
The
Fellas (Friends of Alcoholics Anonymous)
PS
To use “comment” system simply click on the relevant tab below
this article and sign in. All comments go through a moderation stage
PPS
For new aacultwatch forum see here.
Have your say!
Aha! David C is David Clayton, author of various books and eminent contributor to the New Liturgical Movement website, is he not?
ReplyDelete